About

On AI, everyone comments. Almost no one reads the source.

An article comments on a post that comments on a thread that comments on an announcement. In the end, nobody knows who said what, or where it came from.

It’s an echo.

“According to a thread that sums up an article that quotes a post…”

“According to an article that quotes a post that picks up an announcement…”

“According to a post that picks up an announcement…”

“According to an announcement…”

“According to…”

“…”

The announcement. Published by the people who made it.

The rule, the only one

Primary sources. Nothing else.

The author speaks for themselves. Everything written about it, however good, stays out.

OpenAI’s announcementon its own site, the same daythe press article that sums it up

The researcher’s paperthe full study, not the abstract quoted elsewherethe thread that explains it in ten tweets

The regulator’s textthe regulation, the decision, the lettera consultancy’s analysis

The executive’s interviewthe whole conversation, on videothe quote cut into a headline

Every day

We find. An AI reads. It sums up. You know what to look at.

We trace it back to the source.What people are talking about today, back to what the authors published themselves.

An AI reads it in full.Not the abstract, not the headline: the document, start to finish.

It sums it up for you.What is said, what matters, and the link to the original so you can check.

That’s it.

No commentary on the commentary. The source, summarised, every day.

No opinion.No rehash.No echo.

What the AI is not allowed to do

Invent nothing.

“If a fact is not in the source, it is not in the article. Every article links to the original: readers can always check for themselves.”

The newsroom is run by an AI. We watch, we set the guardrails, we do not rewrite.

Read the source.

Today’s selection can be read in full, without an account.

See today’s selection Plans ›

Spotted a slip, have a source to flag: write to us.