McKinsey: 13 Frontier Technologies, and the AI That Absorbs Everything
The fifth edition of the Technology Trends Outlook puts $223 billion on energy, $124 billion on AI — and reveals a far less discussed signal on the jobs front.
In brief
McKinsey has published the fifth edition of its Technology Trends Outlook: 108 pages, 13 "frontier" trends scored on interest, innovation, investment, and adoption level. AI becomes less one trend among others than an amplifier of all the others, with two new entries: agentic AI and application-specific semiconductors. Behind the rebound in investment — up in ten out of thirteen trends in 2024 — job postings decline in eleven out of thirteen cases.
🍺 Bar-stool version
McKinsey rolls out its big annual scoreboard of technologies that matter: thirteen trends, 108 pages, and an AI that's no longer just a line in the ranking but the highlighter run over all the others. The delicious detail is that money and noise don't go to the same place: energy pockets $223 billion in polite silence, agentic AI gets $1.1 billion but +985% in job postings, and quantum keeps making headlines with an adoption score of 1 out of 5. Meanwhile, in eleven out of thirteen trends, hiring is falling — investment goes up, jobs go down, which is an elegant way of saying we're buying machines instead of people. And since this is a consulting firm selling support across thirteen fronts at once, the real use of the document isn't to figure out where to charge in, but to quietly spot what you can afford to ignore.
Key takeaways
- 1
The 2025 report (108 pages, published July 22, 2025) covers a "baker's dozen" of 13 trends, grouped into three families: the AI revolution, compute and connectivity frontiers, and next-frontier engineering.
- 2
McKinsey merges applied AI and generative AI this year into a single "artificial intelligence" trend, whose interest score jumps from 0.16 in 2020 to 0.91 in 2024, and innovation from 0.43 to 0.89.
- 3
Two new entries: agentic AI, those "virtual coworkers" capable of planning and executing multi-step workflows, and application-specific semiconductors, driven by compute demand.
- 4
Equity investments rose in ten out of thirteen trends in 2024: $223.2 billion for energy and sustainability, $131.6 billion for mobility, $124.3 billion for AI, $80.8 billion for cloud and edge.
- 5
Agentic AI still only accounts for $1.1 billion in investment, but shows +985% in job postings between 2023 and 2024 — by far the strongest growth in the panel.
- 6
A rarely highlighted counterpoint: job postings decline in eleven out of thirteen trends, down to -17% for bioengineering, -15% for quantum, and -14% for advanced connectivity.
- 7
Six cross-cutting themes structure the year: the rise of autonomous systems, new forms of human-machine collaboration, obstacles to scaling, national competition, the coexistence of massive and specialized, and the imperative of responsible innovation.
A three-family reading framework
McKinsey is now on its fifth edition of this exercise, authored by Lareina Yee, Michael Chui, Roger Roberts, and Sven Smit. The methodology hasn't changed: each trend gets an innovation score (patents and research publications), an interest score (press and web searches), an estimate of equity investment, and an adoption rating from 1 (frontier innovation) to 5 (fully deployed).
This time, the 13 trends are arranged into three blocks. The "AI revolution" groups artificial intelligence and agentic AI. "Compute and connectivity frontiers" bring together application-specific semiconductors, advanced connectivity, cloud and edge, immersive reality, digital trust and cybersecurity, and quantum technologies. "Next-frontier engineering" covers robotics, mobility, bioengineering, space, and energy and sustainability.
This breakdown isn't cosmetic: it shows how radically the profiles differ. AI is a general-purpose technology, rated 4 on adoption, deploying everywhere. Quantum remains rated 1 — potentially transformative for cryptography and materials science, but still far from real business impact despite announcements from sector giants.
AI is no longer a trend, it's a multiplier
The report's most important conceptual shift fits in one sentence: AI is presented as "a foundational amplifier of the other trends." Its impact increasingly runs through combinations — speeding up robot training, advancing scientific discovery in bioengineering, optimizing energy systems.
Methodological consequence: McKinsey drops the distinction between applied AI and generative AI, analyzed separately in previous years, because market solutions now blend both. The numbers follow: interest score of 0.91 out of 1 in 2024, innovation at 0.89, and $124.3 billion in investment, up from $64 billion in 2020.
But the firm is careful to temper this. Realizing AI's full potential will still require innovations to master compute intensity, reduce deployment costs, and finance infrastructure — plus serious approaches to safety, governance, and workforce adaptation.
The two new entries: agents and custom silicon
Agentic AI combines the generality of foundation models with the ability to act: agents that plan and execute complex tasks, communicate with each other, and adapt to new information. McKinsey notes the emergence of both generalist agent platforms and specialized agents, particularly for deep research.
The figures remain modest in absolute terms: $1.1 billion in investment in 2024, an interest score of 0.0033, and an innovation score still rounded to 0. It's the momentum that stands out: +985% in job postings between 2023 and 2024, and adoption already rated 2.
Application-specific semiconductors are the other novelty, and they stem directly from AI. Facing exponential demand for compute, memory, and networking for training and inference — and the need to manage cost, heat, and power consumption — patents have surged. $7.5 billion in investment in 2024, up from $3 billion in 2020, and an innovation score of 0.52, among the highest in the panel.
Where the money actually goes
After a 2023 marked by weak markets and declining funding, the investment climate stabilized and then rebounded in 2024. Ten out of thirteen trends are up.
The ranking is telling: energy and sustainability technologies dominate with $223.2 billion, ahead of mobility ($131.6 billion) and AI ($124.3 billion). Next come cloud and edge ($80.8 billion), cybersecurity ($77.8 billion, more than double 2020's level), and bioengineering ($57.3 billion, sharply down from $127 billion in 2020).
At the bottom of the table, the amounts become almost trivial compared to the media buzz: $9.3 billion for space, $7 billion for robotics, $6 billion for immersive reality — down from $10 billion in 2020 — and just $2 billion for quantum.
In other words, capital remains massively concentrated on energy, mobility, and AI. The most discussed trends aren't always the best funded, and the reverse is also true.
The weak signal: jobs decline almost everywhere
This is the data point the executive summary doesn't highlight. Of the thirteen trends, eleven show a decline or near-stagnation in job postings between 2023 and 2024.
Bioengineering at -17%, quantum at -15%, advanced connectivity at -14%, immersive reality at -11%, space at -9%, energy at -6%, robotics at -2%. Cloud and edge stagnate at +2%, cybersecurity at +7%, mobility at +6%. Only AI (+35%) and agentic AI (+985%) truly pull ahead.
The contrast with the investment rebound deserves attention: money flows toward infrastructure, compute, and physical assets, not toward headcount. And within the tech job market itself, the concentration on AI is visibly happening at the expense of everything else.
Six cross-cutting tensions
McKinsey identifies six themes running through the trends. Autonomous systems — physical robots and digital agents — are leaving the pilot stage for real applications, learning, adapting, and collaborating. Human-machine collaboration models are evolving toward more natural, multimodal, adaptive interfaces, shifting the narrative from replacement to augmentation.
Scaling becomes the real bottleneck. Power supply constraints on data centers, vulnerabilities in physical networks, but also supply chain delays, labor shortages, and regulatory friction over grid access and permitting. The problem is no longer just technical.
Regional and national competition is intensifying: sovereign infrastructure, local chip manufacturing, funding for quantum labs. For McKinsey, it's as much about reducing exposure to geopolitical risk as about capturing the next wave of value creation.
Finally, scale and specialization are growing simultaneously — massive, energy-hungry data centers on one side, low-power embedded models in phones, cars, and industrial equipment on the other. And responsible innovation is becoming a strategic lever: trust conditions adoption.
“Artificial intelligence stands out not only as a powerful technology wave on its own but also as a foundational amplifier of the other trends.”
“Scaling now means solving not only for technical architecture and efficient design but also for the messy, real-world challenges in talent, policy, and execution.”
“Ethics are no longer just the right thing to do but rather strategic levers in deployment that can accelerate—or stall—scaling, investment, and long-term impact.”
Why it matters
This report is valuable less for its predictions than for its dashboard: it's one of the rare exercises that maps, trend by trend, media attention, research effort, capital flows, and skills demand against each other. And this mapping produces useful dissonances. Agentic AI concentrates enthusiasm with an interest score of 0.0033 and $1.1 billion invested, while energy absorbs $223 billion in relative indifference. Quantum makes headlines every time sector giants announce something, for $2 billion in investment and an adoption score of 1. This document should also be read for what it is: a consulting firm product, which sells support on technological transformation and thus has a structural interest in presenting thirteen simultaneous fronts of action to executive committees. Interest scores, built on press coverage and web searches, measure buzz as much as substance — and the report implicitly acknowledges this by recommending, depending on the sector, postures ranging from "watchful waiting" to aggressive deployment. The real lesson is there: McKinsey's grid mainly serves to identify what you can afford to ignore.
Read next
AIToday10,000 Agents, 88 Hours, and a Millennium Problem
Noam Brown (OpenAI) describes scaling swarms of agents — and why alignment has become the only bottleneck that truly worries him.
AITodayAnthropic Lifts the Hood: Claude "Leads" 26% of Its AI R&D
For the first time, a frontier lab has published numbers on how fast AI is building its own successor — and on what it's doing to keep watch over it.
AITodayOpenAI Publishes Its Alignment Failures — And a Framework to Keep Going
Six incidents of deviant behavior, an internal disclosure process, and an admission: the industry hasn't solved alignment.